Split top saw benches - Printable Version +- Woodnet Forums (https://forums.woodnet.net) +-- Thread: Split top saw benches (/showthread.php?tid=7345694) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Split top saw benches - hbmcc - 01-15-2019 (01-15-2019, 05:41 PM)stillgotten Wrote: I think I need to make one of these, just not as good looking. I always wondered if CS acolytes were holding back criticism on this "splay-leg" point. Regarding the parallel beams saw bench I posted earlier, I know nothing about it. It sorta' "looks sturdy". I think I would expand one of the beams to 2x8s. But it's likely I would never use it for hand ripping wood anyway. That's what tailed saws do better for me. RE: Split top saw benches - tomcraw - 01-23-2019 (01-15-2019, 10:26 PM)hbmcc Wrote: I always wondered if CS acolytes were holding back criticism on this "splay-leg" point. The more I use the splay leg CS version the less I like it. I think the longer Roman or whatever style benches from ingenious mechanics will work better just having a longer section in between the legs. I do like to use it as a stool. RE: Split top saw benches - Chuck Nickerson - 01-24-2019 (01-15-2019, 10:26 PM)hbmcc Wrote: I always wondered if CS acolytes were holding back criticism on this "splay-leg" point. Holding back? There's no mystery as to the trade-off involved here. I used the splayed-leg saw benches for three years. I passed them along to my dad when I started ripping some wood by hand (for exercise and skill-building). My split-top saw bench has a two inch gap with a filler at one end for strength. Having bought those rip saws (4 ppi - 9 ppi) I needed to put them to use. RE: Split top saw benches - C. in Indy - 01-26-2019 Seen on owllegend.com: [attachment=16047] |