![]() |
Saw Handle Finish - Printable Version +- Woodnet Forums (https://forums.woodnet.net) +-- Thread: Saw Handle Finish (/showthread.php?tid=7357661) |
RE: Saw Handle Finish - AHill - 09-16-2020 Like Adam, I prefer a saw handle that's got some grip to it. I actually prefer an unfinished saw handle. I have some wood handled screwdrivers, and the very first thing I do with them is remove any finish they have. There's probably a good reason you'll find unfinished handles on Lie-Nielsen chisels and Grace Brothers screwdrivers. I think one reason a lot of members prefer Tru-Oil is it penetrates the wood vs. sits on the top of it. To me, aside from the angle to the tooth line, the two most important things about a saw handle are shape (comfort) and grip. When I'm using a saw, I'm not looking at the pretty grain on the handle. I'm looking at the cut line. RE: Saw Handle Finish - Derek Cohen - 09-17-2020 (09-16-2020, 12:01 PM)adamcherubini Wrote: Just my opinion RE: Saw Handle Finish - adamcherubini - 09-17-2020 Hi Derek- thanks for responding. I think gent's saws were saws for gentlemen (hobby) woodworkers. Their turned handles, while beautiful, are significantly more tiring to use in my opinion. For a single small box, I guess they are fine. I wanted to say something about Joel's saw. That handle is very delicate looking. I believe Joel copied the design from an original saw, possibly from the toolchest of Duncan Phyfe. Its possible Joel got that wrong. Its possible Duncan or his saw maker had small hands. I have heard many complaints about those saw handles being too small. I think the concern is that they are harder to keep hold of because they are so thin, which goes to my point. That said, I have long hands (because I'm freakishly tall like Schwarz). I found Joel's saws perfectly comfortable to use (at least for the 5 minutes I used them at conferences). I particularly liked the shallow depth of the blade and the very fine teeth. I like his saws very much. I'm not sure I think you need grip to control the saw. If I wrote that, that wasn't right. Rather, I think you want the saw glued to your hand such that you don't need hand strength to keep it in its position (if that makes sense). I could see a market for a shrink fit rubber grip or a stretch on thing like they have for weapons. I think I've written too much about this and wasted everyone's time. I think the polished saw handles are beautiful works of art. I think a well made handle that fits your hand and has no finish or just an oil finish is maybe more functional. I think a straight off the file, surface finish is probably good enough for a good usable saw or plane. One caveat - for reasons I wont go into, I typically am pushing myself when I work. Speed is a big part of what I seek in a project, so being pretty sweaty might be part of the reasons behind my opinions. So if that isn't your deal, maybe that would explain very different points of view on this subject. RE: Saw Handle Finish - Derek Cohen - 09-17-2020 Adam, I think that this is a great topic, so no need to apologise. I recall when you were making saws ... oh, about 12 or so years ago. I would love to see a dovetail saw handle of yours. There are many very stylish handles around, but I wonder how much thought has gone into the actual ergonomics of the design, as opposed to simply copying an “established” design? Regards from Perth Derek RE: Saw Handle Finish - Philip1231 - 09-17-2020 (09-14-2020, 03:37 PM)Pedder Wrote: Thanks for the kudos! What you want to know? We are doing it simple and long way: sand from rasp trough100, 120 150 180 240 320 400 600 up to 800 on all the woods and TruOil after that than some carbnaubawax and parrafin mix to pop up. I will attest to Pedder and Klaus's saw handles/finish: they are works of art! RE: Saw Handle Finish - adamcherubini - 09-17-2020 (09-17-2020, 12:02 PM)Derek Cohen Wrote: Adam, I think that this is a great topic, so no need to apologise. I recall when you were making saws ... oh, about 12 or so years ago. I would love to see a dovetail saw handle of yours. There are many very stylish handles around, but I wonder how much thought has gone into the actual ergonomics of the design, as opposed to simply copying an “established” design?Derek, from my perspective, I put a lot of work into handle designs. I started making saws in 1999 or 2000. First saws were straight up copies of Seaton chest saws. But I built and tested and tested and built for years, tweaking the design as I went. By the time I was offering saws for sale, I had prototypes with 1000s of dovetails on them. The features of the handles were complicated by my own user requirements. For example, in the pictures of the 2 Lawyers saws in this thread, it appears the handles hang below the toothed edge. That doesn't work for me personally. When cutting half blind dts, I dig out the tails with the last few teeth at the heel. I also turn the saw around, man up and grab the blade, and pull it into that hard to chop tail area. I found this to be faster than having to chop more carefully and I never liked the beat-the-scraper-in technique. I don't have a 2 lawyers saw. Maybe it can be done that way. Not criticizing their design. I think those guys are great. Just using it as an example of a single feature that I felt, for me, was really not an esthetic choice. For long open saws, I use a variety of 2 hand grips and vertical sawing techniques that my handles had to accommodate. I think you will find old saws with similarly designed features, but modern saw makers, some unaware of these techniques, have maybe misrepresented them, losing that functionality. RE: Saw Handle Finish - Philip1231 - 09-17-2020 (09-17-2020, 02:23 PM)adamcherubini Wrote: . For example, in the pictures of the 2 Lawyers saws in this thread, it appears the handles hang below the toothed edge. That doesn't work for me personally. I checked my Two Lawyers DT Saws: the one with the black handle has it tail about a 1/16" below the tooth line. The other, has its tail about 1/16" above the tooth line. RE: Saw Handle Finish - AHill - 09-17-2020 I will propose that it's really, really difficult for a single saw handle design to be found universally preferable to all saw users. (I'm not claiming anyone has said this.) Everybody's hands are different sizes, and we all stand at different heights, so the hang of the handle and the size of the grip may be comfortable for some users, but uncomfortable for others. I've attended one or two of Adam's classes at WIA years ago. I'd classify Adam on the tall side with larger hands than most. Joel is much shorter than the average guy with smaller hands. What Adam likes, Joel may not like, and vice versa. I have hands on the smaller side, but I'm average height. For me, even Joel's dovetail saw handle is on the small side. I think his choice of a small handle has more to do with making the saw light weight than anything else. The best fit for a saw handle for me was one I made myself. Of my vintage saws, I have an 1900's-ish Disston No. 7 which fits my hand perfectly. I'm inclined to modify the LN dovetail saw handle I have because I think it's too clunky (for lack of a better description). There's no law that prohibits anyone for modifying or replacing any saw handle you currently have to make your saw more ergonomic or more effective. RE: Saw Handle Finish - Scoony - 09-17-2020 I have a Adria DT saw. I have cut hundreds if not a thousand DTs with it. It cuts great, but the handle is fat. I have big hands, but the big handle on that Adria fatigues my hand. I have since got a LN DT saw with a thinner handle, and it is about perfect for me. I have tried TFWW thin saw handle and found it quite comfortable, but the LN does the job for me. This thread got me to pull out the back saw parts I have tucked away. 2 brass backs for 14" saws, and a Disston 12" steel back with some spring steel and saw nuts. I just need to cut out and shape some handles and file teeth to finish them up. Should be my next project. RE: Saw Handle Finish - Pedder - 09-18-2020 (09-17-2020, 02:23 PM)adamcherubini Wrote: Derek, from my perspective, I put a lot of work into handle designs. I started making saws in 1999 or 2000. First saws were straight up copies of Seaton chest saws. But I built and tested and tested and built for years, tweaking the design as I went. By the time I was offering saws for sale, I had prototypes with 1000s of dovetails on them. The features of the handles were complicated by my own user requirements. For example, in the pictures of the 2 Lawyers saws in this thread, it appears the handles hang below the toothed edge. That doesn't work for me personally. When cutting half blind dts, I dig out the tails with the last few teeth at the heel. I also turn the saw around, man up and grab the blade, and pull it into that hard to chop tail area. We never was asked for a saw with that technique. Our design relates to our heavy spines. When the hang is too high it got hard to start the saw otherwise. For halfblinds I would take a gents saw. Maybe even with some pull teet at the fron of the saw. Cheers Pedder |