Posts: 795
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,017
Threads: 1
Joined: Aug 2009
10-28-2017, 09:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-28-2017, 09:27 PM by Bill_Houghton.)
Info about the Chaplin patent planes
Sold by Tower and Lyon. I owned one, but never tried it out, so I can't report on how well it works. The longer ones, like yours, don't seem to have as much collector value as the little short ones.
Back when it was being produced, lots of people were trying to come up with The Best Plane Solution. Stanley's Bailey model won the battle of the planes, in the U.S. at least.
[url=http://www.petermcbride.com/chaplin/][/url]
Posts: 795
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2016
Bill, you are a wealth of knowledge. I appreciate your help whenever I have a question. In a former life you must have been a rocket scientist.
Posts: 3,017
Threads: 1
Joined: Aug 2009
(10-29-2017, 03:34 AM)Tynyyn Wrote: Bill, you are a wealth of knowledge. I appreciate your help whenever I have a question. In a former life you must have been a rocket scientist.
Thanks, but I couldn't even play one on television unless they needed the Dumb Rocket Scientist character. But I've stuck around long enough to have learned a few things.
When I owned one, it lived on the bookshelf at work. It was rare for someone to comment on it.
Posts: 3,545
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2004
Location: Wisconsin
It's likely true the small ones have more value than the big ones, but in terms of utility I think the larger Chaplin's patent planes are nice. That's because the soles are not just corrugated on the bottom, the corrugation makes the sole significantly lighter while retaining stiffness. The blade advancing lever is very quick to adjust on the fly, but its weakness is that it is tricky to move a small amount. Both those features seem more helpful in a larger plane.