There is a natural tendency to associate ring count with quality, but they aren't directly related. There is some correlation, but it's not always the case.
This is what good NZ grown Radiata pine looks like. It's a full size 2x4 that I cut myself. It's knot free, straight, strong and stable. To be fair, you won't find find wood this good in the construction grade pile, as it would get sawn into more valuable appearance grade boards.
Where wide growth rings are associated with unstable wood is when young fast growing pine logs are sawn. The first 5-15 years of pine growth in the core of any log are "Juvenile" wood. This is weaker, and will also shrink in length as it dries. So if one side of a board is Juvenile, and the other later grown wood is more stable, the board is going to bow or crook as it dries. Hence finding boards that are better suited for rocking chairs.
In a slower growing forest tree, that juvenile wood was only a small area in the middle, and the sawmill knows it's going to be low grade anyway. They recover plenty of better quality from the rest of a ~200 year old log. But if a top log from a plantation tree is only 8" dia, and maybe 15 years old, most any board you make from that is going to be low quality. But it it only needs to be good enough to pass grading. The better stuff gets pulled and sold for higher value uses.
You can see in this picture that the board was cut well away from the pith of the log, from wood that was maybe 15-20 years old, and the tree had been pruned early in it's life to remove the lower branches, so no knots in the board. But if you judge it solely on the growth rings, you might assume it's crap.
BTW, my house was built mid 60s, and the construction grade wood is more like the 2019 sample from the first pic.