Frank Booth said:
I just took apart completely almost, all the way down to the column bearing, a 1980's, I think, Type 1 Delta 12" RAS. The thing would be great to have but I checked the runout after I was getting mixed results on some cuts and it's at 8-10 thou out.
I re-checked the runout a dozen times against the fixed arbor flange and then against the arbor itself and then with the blade on and every time it was out about the same amount - 8-10 thou.
What exactly is running out, and what are you measuring against? The shaft doesn't matter as much as the flange, as it's the flange that defines plane of the blade. It sounds like the blade has some 'wobble' type runout, if I'm hearing you correctly.
Frank Booth said:
This has the older motor on it; the cream colored plastic motor.
It's not plastic; it's cast aluminium. And it's epoxied together and not rebuildable. I just threw one out, in fact, but I had taken it apart to see why it's not rebuildable. Glue. And no motor shop would touch it (three-phase, with fried windings).
Frank Booth said:
Can this be fixed? If so can that motor be removed properly without special tools? Looks to take a special tool or tools.
I will use this for precision so if it cant be fixed then she will be gone I hate to say.
It's easy to remove and replace, and the new (third generation) motors fit directly onto it, and accept the second generation blade guard (post-'Plus 10' style) without modification. The newest motors have extruded aluminium motors (no paint), and are 2 hp vs the 1.5 hp you have. And they're serviceable.
If the motor is sound and the bearings good, you may be able to get a machine shop to mount your motor in a lathe, supporting the frame solidly but with the arbor secured in a chuck, and take a light cut on the arbor flange to true it up. Sort of like how they turn brake rotors right on the car these days. The other end of the shaft is available for locating with a live center if you take the little brake off, but I would try to support the shaft in its own bearings, as that's how it operates in actual use. If the shaft is bent a little, referencing the flange to it would sort of defeat the purpose of truing the flange to the actual rotational center vs the physical center.
If you want precision, look at the ways for the carriage. They're probably replaceable hardened rods, which can be rotated 180 degrees to present a virgin surface for the carriage rollers. Which can also be replaced, if needed. That would make it essentially a new saw, as far as wear goes. My old Plus 10 style, which is essentially the same saw (it morphed into the 12" over time), does not have those rods, and the ways are ground into the arm. Not good.