10-03-2016, 02:28 PM
Okay, I've learned something recently, although I did always know that it was possible.
I've now made hundreds of purchases here on WoodNet, and thru Facebook groups and other forums. In all those transactions, I've only been scammed a few times. I know that the forums can't help enforce a transaction, and they shouldn't be asked to. The risks belong entirely to the buyer and seller.
However, in almost all of the transactions, the seller has requested Paypal using the "Friends & Family" fee free option. I understand they don't want a percentage of their sale being taken from them, but that also absolves Paypal from any responsibility to help a buyer from being scammed. The regular Buy/Sell payment system using Paypal has protections that the Fee Free version doesn't.
Recently, I wanted to purchase from a seller here, but instead of agreeing to use the Friends and Family Fee Free option, I asked if he would allow me to use the regular Buy/Sell method, but to add a few dollars to it in order to cover the fees. He declined that option, saying he'd rather not. He said that he may have to declare such a transaction on his taxes using that function. Well, with my accounting background, I knew that, technically (although not in practice by many), if he receives cash transactions, they are just as susceptible to taxation as sales transactions. The tax code leaves room in there, of course. Anyway, all that is just picking nits, right?
The major problem is that the use of the F&F option removes all the protection from the buyer. I'm not comfortable with that unless I know the person, or have had prior good dealings with the seller. ALMOST WITHOUT FAIL, the transaction works fine. Woodworkers, by and large, are great people.
So, without trying to turn this molehill into a mountain, how comfortable are you in using the F&F option with someone you have no experience with, or that has no reputation to lean on? Do you think that a seller should be okay with using the Buy/Sell option with fees if the buyer will cover those fees?
Just looking for some perspective, I guess. Thanks in advance.
I've now made hundreds of purchases here on WoodNet, and thru Facebook groups and other forums. In all those transactions, I've only been scammed a few times. I know that the forums can't help enforce a transaction, and they shouldn't be asked to. The risks belong entirely to the buyer and seller.
However, in almost all of the transactions, the seller has requested Paypal using the "Friends & Family" fee free option. I understand they don't want a percentage of their sale being taken from them, but that also absolves Paypal from any responsibility to help a buyer from being scammed. The regular Buy/Sell payment system using Paypal has protections that the Fee Free version doesn't.
Recently, I wanted to purchase from a seller here, but instead of agreeing to use the Friends and Family Fee Free option, I asked if he would allow me to use the regular Buy/Sell method, but to add a few dollars to it in order to cover the fees. He declined that option, saying he'd rather not. He said that he may have to declare such a transaction on his taxes using that function. Well, with my accounting background, I knew that, technically (although not in practice by many), if he receives cash transactions, they are just as susceptible to taxation as sales transactions. The tax code leaves room in there, of course. Anyway, all that is just picking nits, right?
The major problem is that the use of the F&F option removes all the protection from the buyer. I'm not comfortable with that unless I know the person, or have had prior good dealings with the seller. ALMOST WITHOUT FAIL, the transaction works fine. Woodworkers, by and large, are great people.
So, without trying to turn this molehill into a mountain, how comfortable are you in using the F&F option with someone you have no experience with, or that has no reputation to lean on? Do you think that a seller should be okay with using the Buy/Sell option with fees if the buyer will cover those fees?
Just looking for some perspective, I guess. Thanks in advance.
" The founding fathers weren't trying to protect citizens' rights to have an interesting hobby." I Learn Each Day 1/18/13
www.RUSTHUNTER.com
www.RUSTHUNTER.com