Posts: 490
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
It is a bit small and light for a dedicated shooter imho but I am sure it can work. You will be limited on the size of work it can do easily though...
Posts: 10,118
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: South Alabama
I really think you'd have better success with a #5 or a #6. My #6 works pretty well, even with very small workpieces. The mass of the plane makes for more inertia, which will carry it through the cut more consistently. #5s are still plentiful and relatively cheap.
That said, for very small pieces, your #3 could work okay as long as it's very sharp and the sides are square to the sole. I think you may get frustrated trying to shoot larger pieces with it.
Steve S.
------------------------------------------------------
Tradition cannot be inherited, and if you want it you must obtain it by great labour.
- T. S. Eliot
Tutorials and Build-Alongs at
The Literary Workshop
Posts: 372
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2008
+1 on the 6, it's heavy, long and wide. the little bit of extra width helps with some shooting boards you may make.
pat
Posts: 13,416
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
What Steve said, minimum #5 if you're going to modify it.
Why not try a trade even up for a #5 in the S&S, someone would be interested.
Credo Elvem ipsum etiam vivere
Non impediti ratione cogitationis
Posts: 4,333
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: On my own Ignore List
A #3 is too light-weight, too hard to hold, not enough side wall to keep the plane stable. I agree that the #5 is the choice of the readily available bench planes. A low angle jack plane (#5 size) would be somewhat better but you are looking at a new premium plane rather than a much cheaper antique. The ultimate choice is a dedicated shooting plane.
Posts: 10,727
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
I think it would work fine for stock 1/4" or less shooting end grain.. As others said, it really doesn't have enough mass or length for thicker stock. I've shot end grain on thin stock with a block plane. IMO, at those thicknesses, being sharp is more important than the mass or length of the plane.
Still Learning,
Allan Hill
Posts: 850
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2006
Thanks to all. You have persuaded me to loosen my grip on my wallet and slide a bit further down the slippery slope.
Handplanes are proof that some people will pay $50/lb or more for a lump of iron. IRONIC, I'd say.
Doug
Posts: 13,842
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2001
I agree with other's I believe the #3 is a little small and light, I use a #4 occasionally but a #6 is my go to plane.
Steve