Posts: 12,197
Threads: 2
Joined: Nov 1999
Location: Nebraska City
toolmiser said:
We did some construction about 15 years ago that included can lights above tub and shower. The electrician said then needed to be enclosed per code. Is that right? I'm thinking about changing them out to something with an exposed bulb. Is there a bulb for a can that would have a coating over it to make it legal? Maybe he was in error?
Thanks
The light in my shower and the one over the garden tub both have a trim ring that covers the lens, unlike the can lights in the rest of the house where the flood bulb is accessible.
Posts: 24,108
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2004
An incandescent hit with water while hot could shatter. Not what I want above me while barefoot in the shower.
Matt
If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.
-Jack Handy
Posts: 31,194
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Athens, TN
Can and trim must be rated for wet location. Usually the trim is gasketed.
Rocket Science is more fun when you actually have rockets.
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government." -- Patrick Henry
Posts: 19,156
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio
Why do you want an exposed bulb?
We replaced the bulb (and enclosure) with one of these LED:
It is for wet location. The one we got is also dimmable....I like that because it gets brighter than the 60W bulb we had before, but on low it is very dim for use at night. Biggest downside, is LEDs need a "special" ($20) dimmer switch.