08-01-2016, 01:41 PM
I guess workbench height is a rather "tired" topic, but I think I need some advice. I am in the design stage before building a new workbench.
A couple years ago, I read Paul Sellers about the height of his workbench, which I believe he wrote was 38 inches. He wrote that he was about 5 foot 11 inches at the time, and that 38 inches had always been a good height for him. I am not as tall as he, I am 5 foot 7 inches. So, since I was comfortable working in the kitchen, I based my bench height on the height of the kitchen countertop, 37 inches (figuring that because I am shorter than Paul Sellers I could reduce the height by an inch.)
Now that I'm in the design process for a new bench, I decided to test if perhaps I should go lower. This was based on my readings of the heights of some older Roubo benches, and also a visit to the Amana colonies in Iowa, where I saw several old woodworking benches that were quite low. Also, I figure that my 5 foot 7 inches probably matches pretty well with the heights of woodworkers in the past.
So, I put some plywood on the floor next to my bench and began hand-planing, then added more plywood and continued hand-planing, then added even more plywood and continued to plane. When I measured the height from the top of the plywood to the benchtop, it was about 29.5 inches. OK, that seems awfully low (but felt fine) during the hand-planing. But I think that I was able to plane better because I get get more downward force.
Is anyone using a bench that low? Is it too low for the long-run? Maybe it just feels fine today, but might grow tiresome in a couple months. It's hard to design something by seeing if it "feels right". But that is exactly what the bench design books and articles normally advise: "build the bench at the height that feels right".
I'd like the benefit of the experiences of others, and all the advice I can get, please.
A couple years ago, I read Paul Sellers about the height of his workbench, which I believe he wrote was 38 inches. He wrote that he was about 5 foot 11 inches at the time, and that 38 inches had always been a good height for him. I am not as tall as he, I am 5 foot 7 inches. So, since I was comfortable working in the kitchen, I based my bench height on the height of the kitchen countertop, 37 inches (figuring that because I am shorter than Paul Sellers I could reduce the height by an inch.)
Now that I'm in the design process for a new bench, I decided to test if perhaps I should go lower. This was based on my readings of the heights of some older Roubo benches, and also a visit to the Amana colonies in Iowa, where I saw several old woodworking benches that were quite low. Also, I figure that my 5 foot 7 inches probably matches pretty well with the heights of woodworkers in the past.
So, I put some plywood on the floor next to my bench and began hand-planing, then added more plywood and continued hand-planing, then added even more plywood and continued to plane. When I measured the height from the top of the plywood to the benchtop, it was about 29.5 inches. OK, that seems awfully low (but felt fine) during the hand-planing. But I think that I was able to plane better because I get get more downward force.
Is anyone using a bench that low? Is it too low for the long-run? Maybe it just feels fine today, but might grow tiresome in a couple months. It's hard to design something by seeing if it "feels right". But that is exactly what the bench design books and articles normally advise: "build the bench at the height that feels right".
I'd like the benefit of the experiences of others, and all the advice I can get, please.