Posts: 38
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
We used yellow birch hardwood with a natural poly finish when we remodeled our house about 10 years ago. It looks fabulous -- a bit warmer than maple, which I find agreeable. On paper, birch has somewhat lower hardness than maple. We've accumulated some dings -- probably more than you'd see in a maple floor of the same age -- but few enough that I can live with them. However, we do get significant seasonal variation in the width of the birch. In winter, we have fairly large and not terribly attractive gaps between boards. (One of the perks of living in the mid-Atlantic -- we enjoy high humidity in the summer and very dry air in the winter.) On balance, if I were to do it over again, I'd choose maple.
Posts: 12,932
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Lewiston, NY
If you look at the tangential (plain sawn) shrinkage of maple and birch you'll see they are essentially equal, so there would be no difference in expansion/contraction during seasonal moisture changes. For radial (QS) grain maple has a clear advantage.
I just went through the same decision process in deciding what wood to use for my new kitchen floor. I was going to go with maple until I started looking into the details and found that no one would approve it for use over radiant heat. When I looked up the shrinkage values it became obvious why. If you want to use maple, birch, or any wood with a large seasonal change in width, you would be best off with an engineered flooring product.
John
Posts: 686
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2006
(04-28-2017, 06:27 PM)jteneyck Wrote: If you look at the tangential (plain sawn) shrinkage of maple and birch you'll see they are essentially equal, so there would be no difference in expansion/contraction during seasonal moisture changes. For radial (QS) grain maple has a clear advantage.
I just went through the same decision process in deciding what wood to use for my new kitchen floor. I was going to go with maple until I started looking into the details and found that no one would approve it for use over radiant heat. When I looked up the shrinkage values it became obvious why. If you want to use maple, birch, or any wood with a large seasonal change in width, you would be best off with an engineered flooring product.
John
No radiant heat here. I don't think any flooring manufacturer allows that. I'm in SE PA forced air with a whole house humidifier. I don't really want to use engineered which has its own drawbacks. I am ripping out some builders quality oak. It's a gamble I guess.
Posts: 7,421
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2005
Yellow birch is softer. Don't wear your high heels and you should be OK.
http://www.workshoppages.com/ws/misc/woo...-chart.pdf
No animals were injured or killed in the production of this post.
Posts: 686
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2006
I'll try not too.
I'm aware of the official hardness values. Of course that assumes manufacturers are using hard maple.
Posts: 7,421
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2005
(05-02-2017, 10:36 AM)spazlab Wrote: I'll try not too.
I'm aware of the official hardness values. Of course that assumes manufacturers are using hard maple.
It is slightly harder than heart pine and heart pine has been used for flooring for ages. Not nearly as hard as bamboo which you can usually get at attractive pricing and in almost any shade of tan to brown.
Note on bamboo. It is not stained for color it is carbonized (baked) so the color goes all the way through.
No animals were injured or killed in the production of this post.
Posts: 3,390
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2002
We put birch in our house (2 houses ago but lived on it for 5 years) to save money over maple. My wife always wears heels and we never noticed any dings. Durability wise I never found any issue with it. We were in georgia at the time and the price difference from maple was quite significant. I agree that it has a warmer tone than maple but if you're getting stained that won't be an issue either way.
-Marc