Posts: 12,885
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Lewiston, NY
I use a Woodmaster CT, 1" x 1.3 tpi. It is a LOT cheaper than a Resaw King, like maybe $100 cheaper IIRC. The CT works so well that I've never considered buying a Resaw King so I can't give you any direct comparison. My only comparative comment would be that if your primary reason for buying one of these blades is for resawing thick wood that the Resaw King is probably the better choice if your saw is in the 3 HP range. It is substantially thinner than the CT. But if you have 4 or 5 HP then the CT would be a better choice based on the lower price.
John
Posts: 2,230
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2007
08-29-2020, 12:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-29-2020, 12:12 PM by jussi.)
John can you please provide a link to where you get your woodmaster ct from? When I look at bandsaw blades direct I get $174.60 (12' 6" length) which is almost identical to the resaw king at $174.99 from woodcraft. If I can get the ct for $100 it's a no brainer for me.
https://www.bandsawbladesdirect.com/leno...saw-blades
https://www.woodcraft.com/products/resaw...de-1-x-150
Posts: 11,668
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2006
I use the Woodmaster CT as well on my Rikon 10-345 for resawing. It's a great blade IMO. I purchase mine from bandsawbladesdirect.com
HTH
Posts: 4,578
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: North Front Range, CO
I run a Resaw King, and I am happy with it. I have used and seen other blades that cut better and smoother when new. However, I have found the Resaw King to be consistent over the long term. Feel like it stays 'sharp enough' forever. No experience with the Woodmaster. I have experience with the Woodslicer, which is a Lenox blade, and I actually believe it cut smoother than the Resaw King, but dulled a lot faster.
Math is tough. Let's go shopping!
Posts: 7,008
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
(08-29-2020, 11:29 AM)jussi Wrote: I picked up a Laguna 16HD at an estate sale a while back and have been using the blade it came with. Looks like it's about time I need to clean (possibly resharpen) the blade. This got me thinking I should probably get a second blade just in case I do need to have it sent out to resharpen. Reading the threads here I see many recommend either the Resaw King or WoodMaster CT. They both seem to be about the same price. Has anyone had a chance to use both and can give a comparison and recommend one over the other? The blade length for my BS I believe is 150" if that makes a difference.
There is some agreement that the Woodmaster should not be used on saws with wheels under around 17/18”. The reason is that the blades are fairly thick, and do not like sharp bends. The thinner Resaw King is then the preferred choice.
Regards from Perth
Derek
Posts: 6,179
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Bothell, WA
I used a WM CT and wouldn't buy another one. The teeth are too small so you can't resharpen it. I burned mine up after a few hours of use cutting an african blackwood log with it. Subsequently I bought a TriMaster that has resharpenable teeth. It's much more expensive but I expect it will be lower cost per bd ft cut.
Cellulose runs through my veins!
Posts: 11,668
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2006
I've used/owned both the Tri-Master as well as the Woodmaster CT and they are both great blades. I think the Woodmaster CT is a better resaw performer and better bargain when compared against the Tri-master. With that being said the carbide teeth on the Tri-master are more substantial so, it may provide a longer life especially if one plans on trying to resharpen a band.