11-18-2024, 02:57 PM
I recently installed a variable speed drive in my MiniMax FS-35 J/P. I did it primarily so that I could lower the speed to reduce the amp draw on the motor so that I could take deeper passes as well as add a segmented head. A side benefit should be an improved surface finish because of the greater number of cuts/inch as speed is reduced. Today I did some testing to see if it really is a benefit. Calculations show how the cuts/inch will increase as I reduce the speed of the variable speed drive motor.
![[Image: AP1GczOlCBo7VqY77kUfiTA4LVXcWHCxS7HG2_Bn...authuser=1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczOlCBo7VqY77kUfiTA4LVXcWHCxS7HG2_Bngui86JLMSdyrGLOas4ySHn9A2uodReGalgSpW8DD52OxFCqQz8VqAqOKCJAXD1965zaVjqnpsy_tuanHCARKF0aceo20-othZWOTpQyMUbMrLpu0XUZaGQ=w427-h265-s-no?authuser=1)
I found a piece of stock that I had planed before I changed to the variable speed drive, so that represents the "stock" condition on the chart above, approx. 26 fpm.
![[Image: AP1GczObGp7qhSoJ-AFPQyucliWiPth2vwq1Yi21...authuser=1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczObGp7qhSoJ-AFPQyucliWiPth2vwq1Yi21h-L73ePYXQMxi4E8eadmZPfzD4-U16v4LBohp4wCoCSeGDGZrJF5MhASj-dahkwZ7J4VRXIHwC7puWcU3-BszL1wM6nw0TTIydqcXqfDH2NU200emxvz8w=w1565-h880-s-no?authuser=1)
I don't precisely know the depth of cut that I used on that piece, but I suspect it was 1/32" because that's what I used almost all the time. All of the following photos were done today at 1/32".
With the new variable speed drive set to 100%, the drive speed is 22.5 fpm. This is what the surface looked like on another piece of white oak.
![[Image: AP1GczO2LqLSTfsihBzbPc2sZIidOnLIttw9krBF...authuser=1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczO2LqLSTfsihBzbPc2sZIidOnLIttw9krBFZ9ELpptxMOgg9-UDArQGYFaLlFAnIqWVBMXifEGpELDvodfueLQ_EIFM36BOxk08oORa_42nsvQ3XgTHYgARXbtTkLsMBd-9VPLDr3nyKgqdJCPB1SJJmA=w1565-h880-s-no?authuser=1)
At 50% or about 11 fpm:
![[Image: AP1GczMp38bzsL3YCjJnAOzX4uVklnmQ2gLydAes...authuser=1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczMp38bzsL3YCjJnAOzX4uVklnmQ2gLydAeskNJXSNSA8Y0Nou9CxPaDr8BVfseegHAcT1WJibOpQJChj9N93eCz3hXBWV-T-ntsT0ARyf0IhPhFv-FSZ4YWGQQHa7zjzVgA4vr8PI7OULpO535fEfpYDQ=w1565-h880-s-no?authuser=1)
And at 25% or about 6 fpm:
![[Image: AP1GczMAUcbNHpGwaN2IfeUG43s0kTbVnTsujfy3...authuser=1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczMAUcbNHpGwaN2IfeUG43s0kTbVnTsujfy34jql9pLIpZsWXaR2YnVES41SIc0tEWlb1VQCnAY94mf-HsxkDnCgWb8zi5ylOlx2If6IpIF3oqfG5pHrUGwQj5b-dL_pGapv-DM1y6ezyyhkqD9aNXalUg=w1565-h880-s-no?authuser=1)
It's clear to me that surface quality increased as speed was reduced down to 50%, or 11 fpm, but there was no additional benefit at 6 fpm.
To further evaluate the potential benefit of variable speed feed rate, I found a piece of ash that had some pretty good tear out in one spot. It was done at 26 fpm, before the change:
![[Image: AP1GczNnOfT48SkcWnl2KlVNEL7SDq9qKH5S5f8k...authuser=1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczNnOfT48SkcWnl2KlVNEL7SDq9qKH5S5f8kUSRiZ0XQTXFZrI-hd10Wsev4OpWo7H8PAAREnhnNjY5AlaTwhVDQ3OC8KkcoYnbeX2zvQWuqIKUFes1d2BVMVD1T_NVrf91PE8KF40uE5l4ELVQ2-kMKCg=w1565-h880-s-no?authuser=1)
Here's what it looked like at 22.5 fpm with the same 1/32 depth of cut as used for the other tests:
![[Image: AP1GczOMveCbr6-HXLdAxIV7uHE5u8BJAdeJ8gJC...authuser=1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczOMveCbr6-HXLdAxIV7uHE5u8BJAdeJ8gJCxeY4WUzXcU9feA6Hl58chkqfsGvapsbBA38BoZe30BUR71Dru-KYoAA1CP_fnMGKz4RVv9iitoBpJgFP32Lhp4P7i8RNGQS3Z7xt8NT9-HmRfUPCd5Zqvw=w1565-h880-s-no?authuser=1)
And at 50% or 11 fpm:
![[Image: AP1GczMWqurlKdZuifDJAz2WhgNm6SWTzdKRMwCT...authuser=1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw/AP1GczMWqurlKdZuifDJAz2WhgNm6SWTzdKRMwCT25E5YnQqoBSNYrIR8x1rahnkOgzUimqxlAq8vox9_tjw-6IVukdDAWvICJDNMgdR1neSo7NvznCBlwR6ZUsQWVHZ_aDHMJA0wxBILyMpecJYjRy2m74z9w=w1565-h880-s-no?authuser=1)
There was not much or any benefit at 22.5 fpm, but if not for that one chip at 11 fpm, I would call it a dramatic improvement. Even with that chip, it's a major improvement over either of the higher speeds.
The improvement in cut quality in difficult wood now has me reconsidering the merits of a segmented head, beyond the obvious of longevity compared to straight knives. I'm going to do more testing when I get a chance to see if the tear out results are consistently better at lower speed.
John
I found a piece of stock that I had planed before I changed to the variable speed drive, so that represents the "stock" condition on the chart above, approx. 26 fpm.
I don't precisely know the depth of cut that I used on that piece, but I suspect it was 1/32" because that's what I used almost all the time. All of the following photos were done today at 1/32".
With the new variable speed drive set to 100%, the drive speed is 22.5 fpm. This is what the surface looked like on another piece of white oak.
At 50% or about 11 fpm:
And at 25% or about 6 fpm:
It's clear to me that surface quality increased as speed was reduced down to 50%, or 11 fpm, but there was no additional benefit at 6 fpm.
To further evaluate the potential benefit of variable speed feed rate, I found a piece of ash that had some pretty good tear out in one spot. It was done at 26 fpm, before the change:
Here's what it looked like at 22.5 fpm with the same 1/32 depth of cut as used for the other tests:
And at 50% or 11 fpm:
There was not much or any benefit at 22.5 fpm, but if not for that one chip at 11 fpm, I would call it a dramatic improvement. Even with that chip, it's a major improvement over either of the higher speeds.
The improvement in cut quality in difficult wood now has me reconsidering the merits of a segmented head, beyond the obvious of longevity compared to straight knives. I'm going to do more testing when I get a chance to see if the tear out results are consistently better at lower speed.
John