I think you are proceeding under the often repeated misconception that the right-bevel is going to contribute to a kickback, without realizing just how rare this occurrence actually is.
In 14 years following kickback stories on the internet, this is the first time that I have seen it documented, and as I pointed out above, it wasn't the blade tilt that caused the kickback.
Lumber Yard said:
With all things being equal prior to the cut and with zero chance of kickback what cut do you make?
With all things being equal prior to the cut with 100% certainty of kickback what cut do you make?
If I knew there was 0% chance of a kickback, I would stand on top of the saw and push the workpiece through with my foot so I didn't have to expend as much energy. With a 100% chance of kickback, I would tie a rope around it and pull it through with my truck, because I would know that no matter what I did, I was going to break something.
Yes, these are silly answers to silly questions. The point is, I want to make the chance for a kickback be as close to zero as I possibly can.
Maybe these questions are more applicable, because they have ramifications to the decisions being made (p.s. I actually came up with these before you made your posting, so I got a kick out of your approach)
:
Which would you rather do, drive down the freeway (in the correct direction) but with the car in reverse--knowing that an accident is more likely to happen, but that when it does, you will not be injured as badly because your back is into the seat?
Or would you rather drive down the freeway in the forward direction where you can see the accident coming and avoid it, but when an accident does occur, you will be more likely to get injured?
For a warning that gets repeated as frequently as blade-tilt warnings get repeated, what you virtually never hear about are the actual accidents that the warnings warn about. That is because they are incredibly rare.