04-20-2016, 01:20 PM
Don't want to add any more confusion to my other post...so I thought I would start a new one.
Quick back story...I am in the process of renovating my living room and dining room and am trying to finalize a lighting plan.
For usage....there is an 8 person dining table in the dining room with plans for a sideboard. The living room is mostly empty...however we have a very large extended family. When large family events occur, I bring in two extra 8 foot tables and end up with one massive table spanning both rooms. But once those events pass...the living room is back to a hutch, and plans for two chairs and a small table in the front.
Current:
Currently...the four 6" cans in the dining room put out too much light and are focused over where the table will be. First proposal is to remove two of the 6" cans and then mirror the "two cans, two wall sconces" in the living room:
Three things I should mention:
- I am sanding down an old textured/stippled ceiling in both rooms...which will require a skim coat of mud as well...so patching drywall won't add too much pain.
- I am planning on installing box in the center of both rooms. This won't be used right away...but gives us the option of installing a visible light fixture down the road without disrupting the ceiling again.
- There is a bedroom and bathroom above this floor, so I have no attic access. The ceiling joists run North/South in these images.
Second proposal:
This is the most involved. Reduce down to 4" cans and increase their spacing. To JTTHECLOCKMAN's point in my other thread, I will also do some research to find LEDs that can dim to zero...or just stick with regular bulbs so I'm not stuck right back where I am today with 4 lights, that while dimmed all the way down...still put out too much light to create any form of "mood lighting"
Any input/criticism is appreciated...I know that the second option is more painful, but feels like it's the more "right" approach. I'd rather something take longer...and only do it once...versus going the easy route and being disappointed in the long run.
Thank you all for taking a look and making a suggestion.
Kevin
Quick back story...I am in the process of renovating my living room and dining room and am trying to finalize a lighting plan.
For usage....there is an 8 person dining table in the dining room with plans for a sideboard. The living room is mostly empty...however we have a very large extended family. When large family events occur, I bring in two extra 8 foot tables and end up with one massive table spanning both rooms. But once those events pass...the living room is back to a hutch, and plans for two chairs and a small table in the front.
Current:
Currently...the four 6" cans in the dining room put out too much light and are focused over where the table will be. First proposal is to remove two of the 6" cans and then mirror the "two cans, two wall sconces" in the living room:
Three things I should mention:
- I am sanding down an old textured/stippled ceiling in both rooms...which will require a skim coat of mud as well...so patching drywall won't add too much pain.
- I am planning on installing box in the center of both rooms. This won't be used right away...but gives us the option of installing a visible light fixture down the road without disrupting the ceiling again.
- There is a bedroom and bathroom above this floor, so I have no attic access. The ceiling joists run North/South in these images.
Second proposal:
This is the most involved. Reduce down to 4" cans and increase their spacing. To JTTHECLOCKMAN's point in my other thread, I will also do some research to find LEDs that can dim to zero...or just stick with regular bulbs so I'm not stuck right back where I am today with 4 lights, that while dimmed all the way down...still put out too much light to create any form of "mood lighting"
Any input/criticism is appreciated...I know that the second option is more painful, but feels like it's the more "right" approach. I'd rather something take longer...and only do it once...versus going the easy route and being disappointed in the long run.
Thank you all for taking a look and making a suggestion.
Kevin