Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 649 online users. » 12 Member(s) | 634 Guest(s) Google, Facebook, Bing, nogaps, JosephP, EatenByLimestone, Splinter Puller, PVW, sniper, EdL, Bubapug
|
|
|
Poor Man's Clamps |
Posted by: jsears - 11-12-2012, 12:41 PM - Forum: Woodworking
- Replies (26)
|
|
Quite some time ago, a thread was started concerning the "Blokkz Clamp". I'm not sure, but I think it got poofed.
I thought they looked pretty useful, but refused to pay $25 a pair for them.
I've been doing some stuff that requires some acute angles, and thought the Blokkz Clamps were just what was needed to clamp the pieces. But being the tightwad that I am, I decided to try and make some clones.
Here is what I came up with. EXTREMELY simple, they cost me nothing, and by golly, they work.
I took a piece of 1/4" oak, 1-1/2" wide, and cut it to about 6" in length. I then epoxied a piece of 3/4" dowel rod to one end and attached a piece of 80 grit sand paper to the other side. That's all there is to it. They work like a charm.
In my photo, although the angle looks to be a 45°, it is actually 36°. I have tried it on very steep angles such as 72°, and they work equally as well.
45's and 90's are easy enough to clamp with about any conventional clamp. But the more acute angles are a little tougher. Maybe this will be of use to some others here.
Jim
|
|
|
Help me pick a utility trailer |
Posted by: RolHammer - 06-22-2012, 12:47 PM - Forum: Home Improvement
- Replies (7)
|
|
RolHammer said:
Is a tilt bed as useful as it seems it'd be? Any other advice as to things I should consider in selecting a trailer for myself for the use outlined above?
I've found my tilt capability to be about as non-useful as it seemed useful when I got it. I'd go for the ramp in a heartbeat.
Unless the tilt function is powered (hydraulic), anything I might want to dump is too heavy to dump by hand, and putting the tractor up there with the bed tilted leads to a big crash when it tilts flat, and can't really be controlled by careful driving.
Mine has to have the tilt capability because it's a folder, but if it was rigid, non-folding type, I'd go for the ramp without a second thought. That's based on what I use it for, not what someone else might do with it. I use it for mulch, firewood, moving by tractor to my in-laws' place for fall cleanup and winter storage, that sort of thing.
|
|
|
Old B & W Books and SS |
Posted by: Skip J. - 03-06-2012, 03:57 PM - Forum: Woodworking Hand Tools
- Replies (40)
|
|
A recent conversation with BJ about SS gifts on my bench build thread got me to thinking of another SS gift. A SS in a different year - who remained nameless - sent a note that he had read my posts and noticed I liked old B & W books and magazine articles. So he sent several things along with 2 old B & W books. Here's the pic from the old "after SS gift thread":
Now that I kinda sorta have a bench and a lot of suggestions to build something, I thought a re-read of these particular two was in order. I am almost thru with the first one "How to Work with Tools and Wood". It is the official Stanley publication copyrighted in 1942. It has the original Stanley adv pamphlet "The Joy of Accomplishment" with a list "Selecting Tools for a Home Workshop" at the end and ads for "Stanley Tool Guide, Stanley Plans and Book (this book), and more Stanley Plans". While it is at the beginner level, it is 174 pages of very complete descriptions.
I guess it's been enough years now that I can say again, what I think is lost in the current crop of full color book and magazine articles is that much or most of the communication of detail is left up to the pics and color drawings. I do this myself every day in my business and am thankful that a pic can show more than a thousand words. But I don't do ww'ing for a business and when I read the old materials before color printing, the B & W text and drawings had to go the whole nine yards to try to describe whatever complex technique was at hand. That is, while the language is a bit stilted, I find the language much more descriptive (without the color) and really enjoy soaking up the essence of the era at leisure.
What makes the biggest impression now on a re-read is that in there nowhere does it mention how something could be done some other way with power tools. It assumes that if you're going to work your way all the way up to the most difficult joints that you would be using a #55 to do them with....
Next up I'm looking forward to reading again "A Manual for Hand Woodworking" by DeWitt Hunt, copyright 1925. While it only has 141 pages by comparison to the Stanley book, the subjects it does cover are in greater detail. To that nameless SS, once again, thanks very much! Here they are with their brethren back then:
|
|
|
|