Don't mind at all. In fact, I am kind of grateful for the opportunity to see if this is normal since I can't pick this stuff up locally and am stuck buying it online. So I'd be very happy with any thoughts you have on it.
Starting with usage, I very rarely use paste wax as a final finish. I mostly use it as a preservative for my cast iron surfaces on the drill press, jointer, and saw, and as a lubricant on drawer runners or to slick up the sides of small piston-fit drawers. The materials I use it on most are doug fir, walnut, maple, and cherry, as well as Baltic Birch ply. Usually these surfaces are going to rub up against something else, so they get sanded to 180-220, then get a liberal coating applied with a shop towel or cotton rag. I give it about 15 minutes, then buff them with a clean towel or rag.
Pictures make it hard to see, but the Lundmark I have is actually gritty.
Feels like all the little wax beads have separated from the solvent.
I globbed some Lundmark on the left, and Johnson's on the right of this piece of scrap, which shows the grittiness of the Lundmark a little better.
Still buffs reasonably clear.
Walnut shows the difference between buffed Johnsons and buffed Lundmark a lot better. Lundmark on the left, Johnsons on the right.
The Lundmark buffs very clear and has a deeper, glossier finish. The Johnsons is hazier and much more matte in appearance. However, the Johnsons seems to slide a little smoother against other smooth surfaces.
So that's my story. I can see how the Lundmarks would make a much nicer final finish, and given that it says 'anti-slip' on the can, I am not surprised to find it is not as slick as the Johnsons. For use as a cast iron preservative, I doubt it will matter much one way or the other. But I am curious if my can is normal for the product, or if I might be better served by tossing it and buying another can.
Math is tough. Let's go shopping!