jussi said:
What type of paint do you guys use to repaint a hand plane
I assume that you are referring to Stanley planes ...
The answer is "it depends ...".
If the plane is one that you wish to return to original specifications (because this is important to that particular plane), then use Japanning. If the plane is a user that I wish to restore (because it was found in poor condition), then I paint it with semi-gloss engine enamel.
The Japanning method I use is a cold cure version, not the bake-in-an-oven variety.
The heart of japanning is asphaltum, which in powder form looks like dark brown soot. The traditional method is to bake this on to the iron, which is smelly, and may create noxious vapours. Do not try it in your kitchen oven!
I received this cold cure japanning recipe of Stephen Shepherd – quite simply, it is half asphaltum and half marine varnish.
Paint it on and leave to cure for three weeks. It is self-levelling, so keep surfaces flat.
I have an article here:
http://www.inthewoodshop.com/ToolRestora...nning.htmlThis shooting board was re-japanned ..
.. as was the Stanley #51 plane ...
A couple of months ago I stripped and spray painted this Stanley #3 ..
It came out really well. One would be hard-pressed to tell the difference in colour and texture with real japanning. However, paint does not have the same finish as japanning ... painted surfaces have a flatter surface and leave the lettering with greater definition. Some will prefer this to japanning.
I am in the process of painting a Bedrock #605. I purchased this on eBay recently .... I don't have a #5 as a jack plane. I use a woody I built. Before this I used a #5 1/2. I have never used a #5, amazing as that may seem! They appear quite rare in Australia!! Occasionally one comes up on eBay Australia, but it is a sad Australia-made version (horrible beech or painted or plastic handles) and they cost more than those advertised on eBay USA. I wanted to know what others saw in the #5. So I decided to buy a USA-made #5 on eBay USA. The shipping costs are, however, more than a typical plane is worth, so I decided I may as well get a #605.
I bought the cheapest #605 I could find. It was "restored", which meant lapped and painted. Ehhh .. whatever (I figured that the lapping would save some work and that I could always strip and re-paint if the plane was as glossy as it appeared).
When it arrived I discovered that the sole was not flat insofar as the blade needed to project an extra 1mm past the mouth to cut and the heel was rounded. Not good. The painted surfaces were in high gloss black, which was not a good look. The blade (by now I was not going to be surprised) was ground at a definite skew of about 1/8". The handle had a repair (I could see that in the advert - but it was not mentioned), however this was very nicely done, and I am happy to use it this way. (If one of you out there is the Seller, understand why you are not getting any Feedback).
Before pictures from eBay ..
All the parts were there, which was all important ..
But you don't want this level of gloss ...
So I lapped the sole flat on 100 grit belt sander belts, stripped the paint with a paint remover, and then resprayed the body.
This is the engine enamel, which is a USA product. It is a semi-gloss, which is between the flat (as seen in the surfaces of LN) and gloss (as the Seller used) ..
I masked off the paint-free areas and then sprayed three coats. There is a little overspray to scrape off, but it came out well ..
That's where I am up to.
Regards from Perth
Derek