Posts: 7,421
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2005
I avoid wax on acrylic and poly finishes. It complicates refinishing later on. Without the wax you can scuff the surface and apply another coat if it gets damaged. With the wax I would probably take it down to bare wood before applying the finish.
I don't think modern finished require paste wax. But it does provide lubricity when rubbing down with steel wool and that might be the overriding factor.
No animals were injured or killed in the production of this post.
Posts: 95
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2007
This guy uses a super light pass with 400g, then 0000 steel wool, then 0000 steel wool with soapy water.
Any issue with doing that with a water based top coat?
https://youtu.be/O9LOtYFMb-A
Posts: 1,630
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2016
Location: Green & Gold and Red & White country
(02-15-2017, 03:42 PM)Cooler Wrote: I avoid wax on acrylic and poly finishes. It complicates refinishing later on. Without the wax you can scuff the surface and apply another coat if it gets damaged. With the wax I would probably take it down to bare wood before applying the finish.
I don't think modern finished require paste wax. But it does provide lubricity when rubbing down with steel wool and that might be the overriding factor.
MS, Naphtha or Turpentine should remove the wax if need be if you needed to recoat the top.
KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE EQUALS WISDOM. RMB
The SO asked me today, "what are you going to do to day"? I said "nothing". She said, "that's what you did yesterday"! Me, "Yes love, but I was not finished yet"!!!!!!!!
Posts: 4,133
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Lawrence, KS
(02-15-2017, 03:58 PM)JokerRN Wrote: This guy uses a super light pass with 400g, then 0000 steel wool, then 0000 steel wool with soapy water.
Any issue with doing that with a water based top coat?
https://youtu.be/O9LOtYFMb-A
Once fully cured, I'd expect it to be just fine. Also that one isn't using so much soapy water it would be easier to just dunk it in the bathtub.
FYI, finger paints and watercolors are "water based", implying that the solvent is water.
Water borne or water-borne is the correct term in this case. The finish is carried in a solvent that is dispersed in water, i.e. an emulsion.
(My own personal crusade and windmill tilting exercise is to eliminate "water based" as the descriptive term...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b016/2b016fd4b433bfedd0a543e4802098af333f8a84" alt="Big Grin Big Grin" )
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things. -- G. Carlin
Posts: 24,158
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Missouri
Steve
Mo.
I miss the days of using my dinghy with a girlfriend too. Zack Butler-4/18/24
The Revos apparently are designed to clamp railroad ties and pull together horrifically prepared joints
WaterlooMark 02/9/2020
Posts: 95
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2007
Thanks.
I will hence-forth use "water-borne" as the descriptive verbiage.
I am on a similar crusade against people saying things like "I could care less," and the misuse of "there, their, and they're."
Posts: 4,133
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Lawrence, KS
(02-15-2017, 05:20 PM)JokerRN Wrote: Thanks.
I will hence-forth use "water-borne" as the descriptive verbiage.
I am on a similar crusade against people saying things like "I could care less," and the misuse of "there, their, and they're."
As we all go forth, making the world a better place one pet-peeve at a time.
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things. -- G. Carlin
Posts: 1,630
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2016
Location: Green & Gold and Red & White country
(02-15-2017, 05:30 PM)Rob Young Wrote: As we all go forth, making the world a better place one pet-peeve at a time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2240b/2240b0eb03c2cfc06bc1f75a4a03f42071ad97eb" alt="Laugh Laugh"
Just remember, 1 mans pet peeve may be an other mans joy.
KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE EQUALS WISDOM. RMB
The SO asked me today, "what are you going to do to day"? I said "nothing". She said, "that's what you did yesterday"! Me, "Yes love, but I was not finished yet"!!!!!!!!
Posts: 7,421
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2005
(02-15-2017, 04:15 PM)MikeBob Wrote: MS, Naphtha or Turpentine should remove the wax if need be if you needed to recoat the top.
It removes some and smears the rest around. I would bet that you'd need to use 10 clean cloths plus naptha to get enough of it off for excellent adhesion.
Silicon is worse. Chrysler had received stamping oils contaminated with silicon in the 1980s. It caused the paint to peel. They had made arrangements to have the cars repainted but they peeled also. Once you get silicon on a finish it will stay for ever.
Wax is not as bad, but since most modern finishes don't require wax I would leave it off.
No animals were injured or killed in the production of this post.
Posts: 4,133
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Lawrence, KS
|