Posts: 13,416
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
12-03-2021, 08:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2021, 08:55 AM by Admiral.)
Very interesting discussion about "Trademark Trolls" :
https://www.reddit.com/r/handtools/comme...trademark/
Apparently there is still time to object; perhaps BenchCrafted should be interested in opposing this as if granted they could be forced to pay for/or have to litigate the right to use the term. Pretty slimy attempt; they are also trying to trademark "Scary Sharp".
Edit: link to Taytools website where they use "TM" after Moxon Vise.
https://taytools.com/pages/search-result...rdware+kit
Credo Elvem ipsum etiam vivere
Non impediti ratione cogitationis
Posts: 1,396
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2008
Well, that is pretty scummy behavior. Shows a lack of character from the owner. I wouldn't purchase from them on a bet.
Zachary Dillinger
https://www.amazon.com/author/zdillinger
Author of "On Woodworking: Notes from a Lifetime at the Bench" and "With Saw, Plane and Chisel: Making Historic American Furniture With Hand Tools",
Posts: 3,545
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2004
Location: Wisconsin
12-03-2021, 09:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2021, 09:54 AM by Alan S.)
I think it's an odd sort of bug. They clearly state it's called a Moxon vise because of its description in a 400 year old book. I think the TM is left over from the Grabo, an actually trademarked name. Note that the links incorrectly say "Moxon vise/Grabo".
Taylor Tools does not seem the type of company to intentionally try to copyright such things. My guess is that after finding the "/Grabo TM" in a description, they did a global search and replace for "/Grabo" and forgot to also remove the "TM".
Posts: 1,396
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2008
12-03-2021, 09:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2021, 09:59 AM by ZachDillinger.)
(12-03-2021, 09:51 AM)Alan S Wrote: I think it's an odd sort of bug. They clearly state it's called a Moxon vise because of its description in a 400 year old book. I think the TM is left over from the Grabo, an actually trademarked name. Note that the links incorrectly say "Moxon vise/Grabo".
Taylor Tools does not seem the type of company to intentionally try to copyright such things. My guess is that after finding the "/Grabo TM" in a description, they did a global search and replace for "/Grabo" and forgot to also remove the "TM".
The Reddit link above describes that the company has filed official paperwork to trademark "Moxon vise". It isn't an artifact from a previous name. They also have TM after "Scary Sharp" on their website, which is almost as ridiculous.
Zachary Dillinger
https://www.amazon.com/author/zdillinger
Author of "On Woodworking: Notes from a Lifetime at the Bench" and "With Saw, Plane and Chisel: Making Historic American Furniture With Hand Tools",
Posts: 6,704
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2006
(12-03-2021, 09:51 AM)Alan S Wrote: I think it's an odd sort of bug. They clearly state it's called a Moxon vise because of its description in a 400 year old book. I think the TM is left over from the Grabo, an actually trademarked name. Note that the links incorrectly say "Moxon vise/Grabo".
Taylor Tools does not seem the type of company to intentionally try to copyright such things. My guess is that after finding the "/Grabo TM" in a description, they did a global search and replace for "/Grabo" and forgot to also remove the "TM".
https://www.bizapedia.com/trademarks/own...s-llc.html
They applied for both Moxon Vise and Moxon Vice (along with Scary Sharp and 1-2-3 Blocks)
That seems pretty intentional and shady to me.
Posts: 38
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
They are also trying to register a trademark for "1-2-3 blocks", filed the same day as their application to register "Moxon Vise".
Posts: 1,396
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2008
(12-03-2021, 12:35 PM)merced Wrote: They are also trying to register a trademark for "1-2-3 blocks", filed the same day as their application to register "Moxon Vise".
Now that is truly ridiculous.
Zachary Dillinger
https://www.amazon.com/author/zdillinger
Author of "On Woodworking: Notes from a Lifetime at the Bench" and "With Saw, Plane and Chisel: Making Historic American Furniture With Hand Tools",
Posts: 5,221
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2014
Location: Santa Maria, Ca
Hmmm. Think I will register a trademark for "shoestrings."
Mark Singleton
Bene vivendo est optimum vindictae
The Laws of Physics do not care about your Politics - Me
Posts: 3,017
Threads: 1
Joined: Aug 2009
12-03-2021, 05:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2021, 05:09 PM by Bill_Houghton.)
Or "dirty jeans," and then sue anyone who refers to needing to put his/her dirty jeans in the wash.
Or maybe "screwdriver."
I don't see how they can prevail on trademarking "1-2-3 blocks."
Posts: 1,146
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Add this to the blatant rip off of the Tite-mark design and it seems evident that the company has no morals. I have bought items from them in the past but after seeing all this, without some justification to the contrary this is not a vendor I want to do business with.
Cliff
‘The problem with the world is that intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence
Charles Bukowski